翻訳と辞書 |
Nixon v. Shrink Missouri Government PAC : ウィキペディア英語版 | Nixon v. Shrink Missouri Government PAC
''Nixon v. Shrink Missouri Government PAC'', 528 U.S. 377 (2000), was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that their earlier decision in ''Buckley v. Valeo'', 424 U. S. 1 (1976) upholding federal limits on campaign contributions also applied to state limits on campaign contributions to state offices. ==Background== ''Buckley v. Valeo'' established a "$1000 cap on individuals' contributions to candidates for federal office" in 1976. A 1998 statute increased the contribution limit to $1075 for statewide office candidates. In that year, Zev David Fredman filed suit alleging that "the Missouri statute imposing limits on contributions to candidates for state office violated" a candidates First and Fourteenth Amendment rights. Fredman further argued that he could only campaign effectively with contributions exceeding $1075. The Federal District Court upheld the statute on limitations to campaign donations. The Court of Appeals then reversed the decision finding that "Missouri's interest in avoiding the corruption or the perception of corruption caused by candidates' acceptance of large campaign contributions was insufficient to satisfy ''Buckly's'' strict scrutiny standard of review."〔(【引用サイトリンク】url=http://www.oyez.org/cases/1990-1999/1999/1999_98_963 )〕〔(【引用サイトリンク】url=http://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/528/377/case.html )〕
抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア(Wikipedia)』 ■ウィキペディアで「Nixon v. Shrink Missouri Government PAC」の詳細全文を読む
スポンサード リンク
翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース |
Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.
|
|